Kindred’s Special: Politicing Is Such A Costly And Wasteful Bore Or Is It??

For an average guy like me –and my sis is a kinship in this regard– the art of political discourse with such saturation by media questions that border on the insane and exhibit the stupidity of time wasted questions that the young in my family circle could and would best the so-called wisest of commentators over each question.  Good Lord!  God, I had a mental fuse blow typing up this paragraph!!

Suffice it to say that by now you get the drift of where I am coming from, present mindset, and where I am going!  Has the World gone Mad? If not, then it sure as H*** is coming at us like sweeping ocean waves. No wonder the audiences of TV broadcasting switch channels constantly.  The old fashion news has been so corrupted and watered down that I finally got the keen idea of purchasing my PC and turning to my blog–the purpose of which I have enlightened my readers going back to July 2007. For those of you who are interested, simply click on the blue design and yo-bingo! up pops my Archives!

There is another reason for omitting commentary about my thoughts on the political scene.  First off, where is Obama on truthful dialog where I find him shooting baskets, attending ball games, hop jumps here and there and almost using his very expensive Boeing.  Likewise, his wife Michel seems to have a hop-skip-jump globe-trotting itch that needs constant scratching, using the magic of the national taxpayers’ credit card. She uses the second Boeing whose main purpose was to fly along whenever the President was in the air to prevent sabotage of his trip destination. Such disregard for thrift!!  In general, I witness excuses; a bizzare critique of American past policies, or; general policies set up to accommodate his voting left-wing pals.  This certainly suggests that, as a junior senator, he had literally no experience in monetary governance regarding our national resource requirements but stubbornly follows policies that hinder development of our natural resources.  He doesn’t understand the element of time required to put such resources to use nor does the liberal wing of the Democrat Party.  In his defense, I must say that the Keystone Pipeline controversy has sufficient pro and con arguments that he wisely does desire to study the effects of leaks known to exist and been damaging to water systems.  The Canadian Indians have been especially hostile to its development saying leaks have caused problems with the water supply even in Canada.

The opposition chaired by the Republican Party high archists demand the Keystone Pipeline go through without any study or delay.  All I can say, because I don’t know the answer, is a bit of caution is worth a pound of cure since environmental damage if the perceived leaks that are on record as having occurred already in truth exists could backfire politically on Republicans. Personally I think off coast drilling both in the Gulf and the two Oceans are needed to assure the USA has sufficient capacity in case of national defense needs and those of our allies.  As far as opening exploration in Alaska, that seems a sore spot with the Democrat Party to the extent that it seems forever blocked by Senator Reed of Nevada. Our country is blessed with natural resources being coal, gas currently housed in the abundant shale that is retrievable due to modern technology methods.  The greatest potential comes from nuclear power and despite lies coming from the media and liberal hysteria, growth continues in that theatre throughout the world.

Now, the Republican Party got a boat load of quality candidates who tossed their hats in the ring.  It has narrowed down to four candidates–Romney, Santorum, Paul and Gingrich.  This has been a huge gap in financial backing with Romney using his fortune and support of friends whose motives for such extravagance is suspect in my mind–why?  After all, we should be seeking the best candidate to be the Republican challenger,  not based upon who can raise the most money. Fat cats have never been ” my cup of tea.”  Manipulating characters have existed for years in both parties, often to the detriment of the public interest.  Policies set in motion by such power can corrupt from top to bottom and back again.

I have heard TV channels give time to Santorum and Gingrich as well Romney.  It is obvious that both Santorum and Gingrich are true conservative in mindset whereas I am not so clear just where to fit Romney.  He seems to dance around a lot in his jovial way of answering questions are just giving that old college try for effect.  On the other hand, I was very much impressed by Santorum but in one area–he talks too much about patriotism without answering real questions about what he would do to improve conditions in the USA.  Gingrich impressed me as always with his knowledge of history and workable plans and ideas for improving the economy and security of our Nation. Both he and Santorum believe in security first and voice better the spirit of patriotism more than Paul or Romney.  Not that they regard it any less but seem shy about expressing it with the conviction by the others.

Other candidates have virtually been sidewindered by media lies to the American public that Romney is the only viable candidate because he will amass the delegates needed to put in his hip pocket.  Sure he has millions to spend on his campaigns that started back in 2008 where he lost out to Senator McCain.  His rich PACs have buried all candidates but for Santorum, Gingrich, and Paul. None of the total dollars raised by all three even begin to do more than sparse TV or radio coverage.  Romney ads bombard the TV-radio waves regularly.  Even the vast majority of newsmen whom you may favor as being decent ladies and gentlemen seem to have fallen under the spell of being hidden snakes in the grass of undermining the need for honest debate. For those who partake in such skullduggery, all I can say is SHAME, SHAME, SHAME!!!  And more shame on the American public for being so naive, stupid, or just ignorant.

So, folks–there is my assessment as of now because we are a long way from the final count.  I admit to being a Conservative regarding most policy programs.  Is there ever a need for middle of the road or liberal views to be enacted into laws? The answer to that lies in the realm of need–of enactment and the consequences that can either have little effect on the public or result like the waves that sweep across the oceans to damage the mainlands of nations. There is an old saying: Be careful what you vote for because you just may get it and it may not be what you were expecting. Is the current White House clan of misfits really what we can take for another 4-years?

God Bless America. Amen.