Kindred’s Special: On Correspondence Chess

Occasionally I have mentioned the enjoyment of playing correspondence chess that was, in fact, my first experience at meeting opponents outside my family circle. My older brother Raymond played by mail for many years that began in WWII. How I learned to play I have reported elsewhere and my mom said I would like to play him a game. It was a real barn burner of tactics and I lost in a 40+ move French Defense he sprung on me but left him most impressed, his being a strong expert. Consequently my upcoming birthday found a package from Chess Review that contained a box of materials to conduct games by mail.  My brother had entered me into a class C social event with 3-opponents, two-games each. I won all six games and they encouraged me to enter the Golden Knights and I won 6-0 but was brought down to earth with 2.5-3.5 against a very strong field of A and expert rated players in the semi-finals that knocked me out of the contest. A later Golden Knights event I finished in the finals with a respectable score.

My introduction to the Correspondence Chess League of America (CCLA) was from my club friend Marcy Shupp who was studying music at the Eastman School of Music and a very strong player. We shared the job of editing a regular club newsletter and he said I would like CCLA play because it was devoted 100% to correspondence play and you could enter ICCF events, CCLA being the official affiliate of the ICCF in North America. So, in September 1958 I became a member of CCLA and have been a member ever since.

The history of CCLA is quite interesting and is the oldest chess organized body in American chess. It boasted some of the very best players in America. At some point it had affiliated itself with the over the board organization that became the United States Chess Federation and actually had more members than USCF. The premier chess organ though was the commercial magazine, Chess Review which had a readership of over 11000.  In those days, USCF had about 1000 members and CCLA some hundreds more.  Some in the USCF decided that USCF should be strictly  over the board chess and dissolved its partnership with CCLA partly to accommodate the wishes of Al Horowitz who operated Chess Review and to avoid conflict of interest with them as USCF felt their readers would rally to USCF if no conflicting postal group existed to attract its own members to join CCLA. Consequently, CCLA – USCF relations soured and great effort was put on allowing Chess Review players to participate in ICCF events contrary to ICCF rules. Benjamin Koppin stated to me that he did not intend to rock the boat by trying insist on CCLA membership. The fact is however that CCLA had to pay for the membership of Chess Review in its affiliation dues according to then secretary Dick Rees. That really caused unnecessary turmoil in the organs that be. The fact is that in chess, rules are meant to be bent, broken, have no principle for truth and written bylaws.

In reality these events proved probably the best for each of the three main groups and other groups formed later on like Helen Warren’s APTC and a military run postal group. Knights of the Square Table (NOST) was founded in Penfield, New York which offered numerous board games by mail and had an annual convention. Most were MENSA members.  Over time NOST dissolved and joined the Fred Miller Chess Group that combined the two and eventually disbanded finding essentially few who could or would be willing to carry the burden of administrative duties.

Correspondence play goes back over a hundred years and in the span of time boasts such a star player as Alekhin who, as World otb Champion, supported fully the founding of the ICCF.  A great many strong masters and GMs have participated in this form of play, and many national federations field teams for the correspondence chess Olympiad. An interesting experiment between a team of otb IMs, GMs vs those representing cc IMs, GMs was fought otb and the correspondence players won the match. The otb team agreed that the reason was that the cc players seemed to understand the openings somewhat better and equal for the general struggle. As a result, many today suggest that more books should be written by cc players devoted to chess study and game examples.

Some interesting books have appeared in print which are part of my library.  Journal of A Chess Master by Stephan Gerzadowicz is a wonderful book that SG wrote about his favorite opening moves for either side of 1.g3 or 1…g6 systems. It is a delightful book that not only fills your cup with chess but also with humor and other tidbits of the very nature of what brings out the spark in such an aesthetic and beautiful game and its effect on devotees, exploring the Thoreauvian world of this cc master as he journeys over the planet via his postcoards, his library, and his imagination.  Highly recommended.

Perhaps my favorite is My Chess Adventures by the English player Charles W. Warburton edited by Tim Bogan. Secrets of a top postal chess player says it all but covers a host of rememberable experiences before, during and after play along with some personal views concerning adjudications and numerous tidbits of interest to the average cc and otb enthusiast.

C. J. S. Purdy: His Life, His Games, and His Writings by J. Hammond and R. Jamieson is a classic collection of both the life and chess battles he waged in both his perfection in writing and game play. He won the lst World Correspondence Chess Championship and his reporting on Australian and Asian chess experiences, the relationship chess had on his marriage and family life. He died at the board while playing in a tournament and had a winning position.

Hans Berliner’s The System–A World Champion’s Approach to Chess is his effort to tell the story of his system for winning the world championship.  I was not sold on it when I studied the content as I was sure it would meet with a critical commentary by viewers. He explains it as a theory of how to integrate board control and development into a unified whole. To be fair, I think he comes as close as possible to define his own thinking as it relates to many principles and evaluations that make up much of his system. What I mean by critical analysis of his theories is just this: Time is on the side of chess history when it comes to dictating a specific or final assessment of how to play the game.  One cannot assume that every game played is a final word. Fischer learned this when he wrote his Bust to the King’s Gambit which, after several KG players offered their ideas, Fischer never responded. Today the King’s Gambit still is played with the same freedom of thought and speculative lines as ever. The System approach is worthy of study and much can be seen in a variety of games that make up modern chess. But there is no final word on anything in chess. Hans Berliner has made a valuable contribution to the advancement of chess theory.

Here I might be forgiven to provide that my own development of square count chess enriched my own manner of chessplay throughout much of my life especially as applied to correspondence games and to a lesser degree in otb play due to the time clock and faster time controls. The principles though can still be applied to most positions and or plan jump moves in defense or attack motifs.

The books I mention are entertaining, instructive, and can lend themselves to the enrichment of theory, exciting moments on the chessboard, and expansion of your knowledge and enjoyment of chess.  Collectively as well as independently they offer the reader the flavor of chess rarely covered with such reflection about the art of chess play!

Chess provides people having a curiosity for problem solving situations to exercise their minds and relieve them of the tensions of the day. In this, it acts as a tool of creating a playground for imagination to soar, reflect, and see on the board the creativity of adversaries as they map out a battle on the 64-squares.

Advertisements

11 Responses to “Kindred’s Special: On Correspondence Chess”

  1. kindredspiritks Says:

    An update: The Fred Miller Group no longer exists.

  2. wholesale bags Says:

    Kindred’s Special: On Correspondence Chess | Kindred\’s Kaleidoscope

  3. Stephen Tomporowski Says:

    Kindredspirits — Do you have any contacts for anyone from the Fred Miller Chess Group or the NOST? I used to do the webpage for the NOST and someone, a former article writer for NOST, was looking to find a copy of one of his old articles. Any lead would help. I lost track of everyone and eventually left chess.

    Thanks….Steve (didymus7@hotmail.com)

    • kindredspiritks Says:

      Hi, Steve! I still have a pile of NOSTALGIA MAGAZINES and possibly a few Fred Miller magazines in my files. I know some left NOST to become writers for a Games Magazine I think located in Canada. That is really when the NOST started to collapse. When Les died things began to decline quickly as so often happens. Brother Ray was one of the original members and I had joined years later. Miss the comradeship with the group. It was a great body of players having quality gamesmanship. Tell him to check out my website and write me with the particular article in question and I shall see if I have it./Don.

      • Stephen Tomporowski Says:

        Hi, Don! It is Kerry Handscomb that is looking for one of his articles. The best info I can get is that the articles is about Shogi rules (by Kerry) and was published in NOSTalgia in late 1995 through 1996. I appreciate you volunteering to claw through the dust to look! My direct email is didymus7athotmail.com. Thanks…Steve

      • Stephen Tomporowski Says:

        Don — Call off the search. Paul Bisaillon found it for him. Thanks for you help! Steve

      • Alberto Bertaggia Says:

        I am a fan of board games and write for the magazine “Il Fogliaccio degli Astratti”, an italian magazine, some items on the board games. Writing an article on the game “Delta” I found out that it was widely played in NOST.
        I ask you, if possible, to be able to communicate on such numbers, especially the first issue, in which he speaks of the game Delta.
        If possible ask also news about the NOST and Nost-algia.
        you can get a copy of NOST-algia?
        Thank you for your attention. Sincerely
        Alberto Bertaggia

      • kindredspiritks Says:

        I wrote extensively on NOST “Knights of the Square Table” in past articles which you likely read already. I have all the magazines during the time I was a member until it folded. It did so because some of the key writers joined a Canadian games magazine from which I never received an invite to subscribe. Hence, I know nothing about it. NOSTALGIA was very good with some very talented and knowledgeable game players and writers. When its founder died, it lost many supporters and eventually folded giving the nod to become part of the Miller Group. That eventually folded. I am not sure if any other magazine deals with games like NOSTALGIA did. It was a class act and had some of the world’s best gamesters. I shall try to find something on Delta. Right now my wife was hospitalized which takes up my time right now./Don.

    • kindredspiritks Says:

      Hi Steve! I found reference to Kerry Handscomb pg 22 #366 Mar/Apr 98. POPPY SHOGI 133.9-T96:
      Baggio 3-1, Tohtz 2-2, Handscomb 1-3.
      John J. McCallion column for results..
      I did find May/Jun 1996 Around the Board-McCallion column
      MICROSHOGI BY kERRY HANDSCOMB covered in page and overleaf. 202-1534 Harwood St. Vancouver BC V6G 1X9 Canada
      Is this the article he refers to?

      • Stephen Tomporowski Says:

        You missed my 2nd reply. I put Kerry got his article from Paul Bisaillon. If you were in NOST, you have to had known Paul ;-). The Microshogi article was probably the one he was looking for. He couldn’t tell me the title, as he didn’t remember it and he said something about an obsure Shogi rule/game, but I don’t know Shogi al all. Thanks for the help.

  4. hermes pink Says:

    hermes paket abgeben bremen Kindred’s Special: On Correspondence Chess | Kindred\’s Kaleidoscope

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: